A short-sighted diplomatic decision...

 

Indeed, a small non-aligned state like Sri Lanka engaging in military actions in a conflict in the Red Sea or any other region can carry significant diplomatic risks. There are several reasons why such a decision could be diplomatically risky

Violation of Neutrality

Non-aligned states typically strive to maintain a neutral stance in international conflicts to preserve their sovereignty and avoid taking sides. Sending military support to one party in a conflict could be perceived as a violation of this neutrality and may lead to strained diplomatic relations with other nations.

International Condemnation 

The international community, particularly organizations like the United Nations, often advocates for peaceful resolutions to conflicts. A small non-aligned state actively participating in a conflict could face criticism and condemnation from other nations, potentially leading to diplomatic isolation.

Potential for Escalation

Military involvement in a conflict can escalate tensions and lead to a broader regional conflict. This could result in neighbouring countries or international powers becoming involved, further complicating the diplomatic landscape and potentially putting the small state at a strategic disadvantage.

Impact on Trade and Economic Relations

Diplomatic fallout may extend to economic consequences, such as trade restrictions or sanctions imposed by nations displeased with the small state's involvement in the conflict. This can have severe economic repercussions for the country.

Compromised International Reputation

Engaging in military actions without a clear mandate or international support may tarnish the small state's reputation in the eyes of the international community. Trust and credibility may be eroded, making it more challenging to secure support for diplomatic initiatives in the future.

Humanitarian Concerns

Depending on the nature of the conflict, involvement in military actions may raise humanitarian concerns. If the conflict involves human rights violations or war crimes, the small state may be associated with such actions, further damaging its international standing.

Potential for Retaliation

Taking sides in a conflict may lead to retaliation from opposing parties or their allies. This could expose the small state to security threats and further complicate its diplomatic and security situation.

In summary, a small non-aligned state like Sri Lanka would need to carefully consider the potential diplomatic risks and consequences before deciding to send naval support to any party in an ongoing conflict, especially in a sensitive region like the Red Sea. Such states must assess the potential impact on regional stability, international relations, and their national interests before taking such actions.

Shantha Dissanayake